Results for D0- D0 Mixing

(assuming CP conservation)

People working on this:   David Asner, Bostjan Golob, Brian Petersen, Alan Schwartz

For a complete list of references click here

For mixing results allowing for CP violation click here

 

Notation: the mass eigenstates are denoted D 1 ≡ p|D0> + q|D0> and D 2 ≡ p|D0> − q|D0>; R D is the ratio of magnitudes of D0 → f and D0 → f amplitudes; and δ (φ) is the strong (weak) phase difference between D0 → f and D0 → f amplitudes.

This page is organized as follows. First, "pure" measurements and their world averages are presented:

Second, combinations of different types of measurements are presented:

 

_____________________________________________

 

D0 → K+l ν results for R M ≡ (x2+y2)/2.


Year Experiment Result Comment
1996 FNAL E791 R M = (0.11 +0.30 −0.27 +0.00 −0.014 )% 500 GeV πN interactions (2 × 1010 events)
2005 CLEO II.V R M = (0.16 ± 0.29 ± 0.29 )% 9.0 fb−1 near Υ(4S) resonance
2004 BaBar R M = (0.23 ± 0.12 ± 0.04 )% 87 fb−1 near Υ(4S) resonance
2005 Belle R M = (0.020 ± 0.047 ± 0.014 )% 253 fb−1 near Υ(4S) resonance
2007 BaBar R M = (0.004 +0.070 −0.060 )%
344 fb−1 near Υ(4S) resonance; decays are
"double-tagged" (tag side is fully reconstructed)
  COMBOS average
R M = (0.0173 ± 0.0387 )%
CL = 0.965
  (output)   stat. and syst. errors assumed uncorrelated;
BaBar 2004 result not included as correlation
with BaBar 2007 not yet determined

            Plot of average:

                       

 

_____________________________________________

 

D0 → K+ K, π+ π results for: y CP ≡ [Γ(CP+)/<Γ>]−1 = (1/2)(|q/p| + |p/q|) y cosφ − (1/2)(|q/p| − |p/q|) x sin φ, and A Γ ≡ [τ(D0 → K+ K) − τ(D0 → K+ K )] / [τ(D0 → K+ K) + τ(D0 → K+ K )] = (1/2)(|q/p|−|p/q|) y cosφ −(1/2)(|q/p|+|p/q|) x sin φ .


Year Experiment Result Comment
1999 FNAL E791 ΔΓ = (0.04 ± 0.14 ± 0.05 ) ps −1 500 GeV πN interactions (2 × 1010 events)
2000 FOCUS y CP = (3.42 ± 1.39 ± 0.74 )% γN interactions (1 × 106 reconstr. D → K n(π) decays)
2002 CLEO II.V y CP = (−1.2 ± 2.5 ± 1.4 )% 9.0 fb−1 near Υ(4S) resonance
2003 BaBar
y CP = (0.8 ± 0.4 +0.5 −0.4 )%
A Γ = (0.8 ± 0.6 ± 0.2 )%
91 fb−1 near Υ(4S) resonance
2002 Belle y CP = (−0.5 ± 1.0 +0.7 −0.8 )% 23.4 fb−1 near Υ(4S) resonance; no D* tag
2007 Belle
y CP = (1.31 ± 0.32 ± 0.25 )%
A Γ = (0.01 ± 0.30 ± 0.15 )%
540 fb−1 near Υ(4S) resonance
  COMBOS average
y CP = (1.12 ± 0.32 )%
CL = 0.430
A Γ = (0.18 ± 0.30 )%
CL = 0.270
( output for y CP )   ( output for A Γ )
symmetrized statistical, systematic errors;
stat. errors for two Belle analyses have correl.= 0.0165;
all systematic errors assumed uncorrelated

            Plot of y CP average:                                                                   Plot of A Γ average:

                     

            Likelihood function: [LF #1]

         

 

_____________________________________________

 

D0 → K+ π results for R D, x' ≡ x cosδ + y sin δ, y' ≡ y cosδ - x sin δ, and R B ≡ R D + y' √ R D + (x2+y2)/2 . These results assume no CPV.


Year Experiment Result Comment
1998 FNAL E791 RB = (0.68 +0.34 −0.33 ± 0.07)% 500 GeV πN interactions (2 × 1010 events)
2000 CLEO II.V
RB = (0.332 +0.063 −0.065 ± 0.040)%
RD = (0.47 +0.11 −0.12 ± 0.04)%
x' = (0.0 ± 1.5 ± 0.2)%
y' = (− 2.3 +1.3 −1.4 ± 0.3)%
9.0 fb−1 near Υ(4S) resonance
2005 FOCUS
RB = (0.429 +0.063 − 0.061 ± 0.027)%
RD = (0.381 +0.167 − 0.163 ± 0.092)%
x' 2 = − 0.059%
y' = 1.0%
γN interactions (1 × 106 reconstr. D → K n(π) decays)
2006 Belle
RB = (0.377 ± 0.008 ± 0.005)%
RD = (0.364 ± 0.017)%
x' 2 = (0.018 +0.021 −0.023 )%
y' = (0.06 +0.40 −0.39 )%
400 fb−1 near Υ(4S) resonance
2006 CDF (Run II) RB = (0.405 ± 0.021 ± 0.011)% 0.35 fb−1 at √s = 1.96 TeV
2007 BaBar
RD = (0.303 ± 0.016 ± 0.010)%
x' 2 = (−0.022 ± 0.030 ± 0.021)%
y' = (0.97 ± 0.44 ± 0.31)%
384 fb−1 near Υ(4S) resonance

 

To combine K+ π results, the three-dimensional log(likelihood) functions for (x'2, y', RD) are added (Belle + BaBar only) . The resulting function is mapped onto the (x'2, y') plane as follows: for a specific (x'2, y') value, the parameter RD is allowed to seek its preferred value, and the resulting likelihood is assigned. The function is mapped onto the RD axis as follows: for a specific RD value, the parameters x'2 and y' are allowed to seek their preferred values, and the resulting likelihood is assigned.

To map the (x'2, y') likelihood function to an (x, y, δ) likelihood volume, the (x, y, δ) space is scanned and, at each point, (x'2, y') is calculated and the corresponding likelihood assigned. Note that this likelihood value must come from the physical region of the (x'2, y') plane, i.e., positive x'2.

To map the (x, y, δ) likelihood volume onto the (x, y) plane, the (x, y) space is scanned and, at each point, the parameter δ is allowed to seek its preferred value, and the corresponding likelihood is assigned.

 

      Belle + BaBar (x'2, y') projection:                                           x'2 projection:

                       

      y' projection:                                                                         RD projection:

                       

      (x'2, y') → (x, y) mapped likelihood [LF #2] :

         

 

_____________________________________________

 

D0 → K+ π π 0 and K+ π π + π results for R B, R M, <R D>, and α<y'>, where <…> denotes a quantity integrated (or averaged) over the selected phase-space region of the Dalitz plot, and α is a suppression factor in the range (0,1) arising from strong phase differences over the Dalitz plot. These results assume no CPV.


Year Experiment Result Comment
2005 Belle
RB(K + π π 0) = (0.229 ± 0.015 +0.013 −0.009 )%
RB(K + π π + π ) = (0.320 ± 0.018 +0.018 −0.013 )%
281 fb−1 near Υ(4S) resonance
2006 BaBar
RB(K + π π 0) = (0.214 ± 0.008 ± 0.008)%
RM = (0.023 +0.018 −0.014 ± 0.004)%
<RD(K + π π 0) > = (0.164 +0.026 −0.022 ± 0.012)%
α<y'(K + π π 0) > = (−0.012 +0.006 −0.008 ± 0.002)%
230.4 fb−1 near Υ(4S) resonance
2006 BaBar
RM = (0.019 +0.016 −0.015 ± 0.002)%
α<y'(K + π π+ π)> = (− 0.6 ± 0.5 ± 0.1)%
230.4 fb−1 near Υ(4S) resonance

 

_____________________________________________

 

D0 → K0S π+ π results. These results assume no CPV.


Year Experiment Result Comment
2005/2007 CLEO II.V
x = (1.9 +3.2 −3.3 ± 0.4 ± 0.4)%
y = (−1.4 ± 2.4 ± 0.8 ± 0.4)%
9.0 fb−1 near Υ(4S) resonance;
The errors are statistical, experimental systematic,
and decay model systematic, respectively.
2007 Belle
x = (0.80 ± 0.29 ± 0.17)%
y = (0.33 ± 0.24 ± 0.15)%
540 fb−1 near Υ(4S) resonance
  COMBOS average
x = (0.811 ± 0.334 )%   CL = 0.74
y = (0.309 ± 0.281 )%   CL = 0.50
(output for x)   (output for y)
symmetrized statistical, systematic errors;
stat. and syst. errors assumed uncorrelated

            Plot of x average:                                                                                     Plot of y average:

                                   

 

            Likelihood function in (x, y) plane [LF #3] :

                       

 

_____________________________________________

 

Ψ(3770) → D0-D0 results, using correlations. The errors are statistical only.


Year Experiment Result Comment
2006 CLEO-c
RM = (0.17 ± 0.15)%
y = (−5.8 ± 6.6)%
cos δK π = 1.09 ± 0.66
0.281 fb−1 at Ψ(3770) resonance

 

            Likelihood function for δ [LF #4] :

                       

 

_____________________________________________

 

R M combination:


Year Measurement Result Comment
  All D0 → K+l ν
R M = (0.017 ± 0.039 )%
CL = 0.965
  (output)   stat. and syst. errors assumed uncorrelated
2006 BaBar D0 → K+ π π
RM = (0.023 +0.018 −0.014 ± 0.004)%
230.4 fb−1 near Υ(4S) resonance
2006 BaBar D0 → K+ π π π
RM = (0.019 +0.016 −0.015 ± 0.002)%
230.4 fb−1 near Υ(4S) resonance
2006 CLEO-c
RM = (0.17 ± 0.15)%
0.281 fb−1 at Ψ(3770) resonance
  COMBOS average
R M = (0.021 ± 0.011 )%
CL = 0.795
  (output)   stat. and syst. errors assumed uncorrelated

            Plot of overall average:                                                                         Likelihood function in (x, y) plane [LF #5] :

                                   

 

_____________________________________________

 

y combination assuming y CP =y, and that y from D0 → KS π+ π - corresponds to [Γ(CP+)−Γ(CP−)]/(2Γ).


Year Measurement Result Comment
  All yCP
y CP = (1.12 ± 0.32 )%
CL = 0.430
  (output)   stat. and syst. errors assumed uncorrelated
  All D0 → KS π+ π -
y = (0.309 ± 0.281 )%
CL = 0.50
(output)
symmetrized statistical, systematic errors;
stat. and syst. errors assumed uncorrelated
2006 CLEO-c
y = (-5.8 ± 6.6)%
0.281 fb−1 at Ψ(3770) resonance
  COMBOS average
y = (0.655 ± 0.211 )%
CL = 0.101
  (output)   stat. and syst. errors assumed uncorrelated

            Plot of overall average:

           

 

_____________________________________________

 

Combination of all data assuming no CP violation (y CP =y) and that y from D0 → KS π+ π - corresponds to [Γ(CP+)−Γ(CP−)]/(2Γ).

To combine all results, we convert each measurement to a likelihood function in (x, y, δ) space and sum the log(likelihoods). The input likelihood functions are shown above: LF #1, LF #2, LF #3, LF #4, LF #5.

The resulting (x, y, δ) likelihood function is mapped to the (x, y) plane as follows: for a specific (x, y) value, the parameter δ is allowed to seek its preferred value, and the corresponding likelihood is assigned.

To map the likelihood function to the x axis: for a specific x value, the parameters y and δ are allowed to seek their preferred values, and the corresponding likelihood is assigned.

To map the likelihood function to the y axis: for a specific y value, the parameters δ and x are allowed to seek their preferred values, and the corresponding likelihood is assigned.

To map the likelihood function to the δ axis: for a specific δ value, the parameters x and y are allowed to seek their preferred values, and the corresponding likelihood is assigned.

 

            Overall likelihood function in (x, y) plane:                                     Overall likelihood function for δ :

                                   

 

            Overall likelihood function for x:                                                 Overall likelihood function for y:

                                   

 

Last modified 3 Dec 2007. Send comments to A. Schwartz or M. Purohit